Cutting food stamps is government’s retaliation for bailing out the banks.
Context and common sense matters when stopping the food stamps to the poor.
WASHINGTON, June 22, 2006, The Supreme Court’s Unanimous Decision substantially enhanced legal protection against
retaliation for employees (Poor Elderly Tenants
too?) who complain about discrimination or harassment on the job (or as a hungry child or Elderly tenant?),
in a ruling on Thursday.
Justice
Breyer said there was "strong reason to believe" that Congress
intended the protection against retaliation to be broader than the protection
against discrimination because it wanted to "deter the many forms that
effective retaliation can take," in
the workplace and beyond.
